2009 Audi RS6 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2009 Audi RS6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 4,991 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi RS6 (572 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi RS6 weights approximately 510 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi RS6 (650 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2009 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi RS6 | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | RS6 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4991 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 572 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 650 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2028 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 74 L |