2009 Audi RS6 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi RS6 (572 HP) has 215 more horse power than 2012 Holden UTE. (357 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden UTE.
Because 2009 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi RS6 (650 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 2009 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE. 2009 Audi RS6 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2012 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi RS6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi RS6 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | RS6 | UTE |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4991 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 572 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 650 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |