2009 Audi S4 vs. 1966 Holden EH
To start off, 2009 Audi S4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S4 (340 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden EH weights approximately 255 kg more than 2009 Audi S4.
Because 2009 Audi S4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi S4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi S4 (410 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi S4 | 1966 Holden EH | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | S4 | EH |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |