2009 Audi S4 vs. 1984 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2009 Audi S4 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S4 (340 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1984 Mazda RX-7. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 1984 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2009 Audi S4.
Because 2009 Audi S4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi S4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi S4 (410 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi S4 | 1984 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | S4 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |