2009 Audi S6 vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Sentia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Sentia would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi S6 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1996 Mazda Sentia.
Because 2009 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Sentia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi S6 | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | S6 | Sentia |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |