2009 Audi S6 vs. 2002 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Mondeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Mondeo would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S6 (435 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2002 Ford Mondeo. (222 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Mondeo.
Because 2009 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Mondeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi S6 (540 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Mondeo. (280 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2009 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Mondeo. 2009 Audi S6 has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Mondeo has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Mondeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi S6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi S6 | 2002 Ford Mondeo | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | S6 | Mondeo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5204 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 540 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.3 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.9 L/100km | 14.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 58 L |
