2009 Audi S6 vs. 2003 BMW 645
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 645. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 645 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S6 (335 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 BMW 645. (310 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 645. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi S6 weights approximately 117 kg more than 2003 BMW 645. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 BMW 645. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW 645 (450 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi S6. (420 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi S6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi S6 | 2003 BMW 645 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | S6 | 645 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.8 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1698 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.9 L/100km | 16.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |