2009 Audi S6 vs. 2004 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S6 (435 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac DeVille. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2009 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi S6 (540 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac DeVille. (407 Nm). This means 2009 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac DeVille.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi S6 | 2004 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S6 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 540 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.3 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.9 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |