2009 Audi S6 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S6 (435 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi S6 (540 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2009 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi S6 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | S6 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5204 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 540 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.9 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 132 L |
