2009 Audi S6 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S6 (435 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (295 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi S6 (540 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Savana. (448 Nm). This means 2009 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi S6 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | S6 | Savana |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 295 HP |
Torque | 540 Nm | 448 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 117 L |