2009 Audi S6 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Audi S6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi S6 (435 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi S6 (540 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2009 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi S6 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | S6 | Armada |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5204 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 540 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.9 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 106 L |
