2009 Audi TT vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 929 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | 60 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5672 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1824 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3230 mm |