2009 Audi TT vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | 60 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3230 mm |
