2009 Audi TT vs. 1942 Jeep MB
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Jeep MB weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1942 Jeep MB. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1942 Jeep MB.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1942 Jeep MB | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | MB |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3820 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2040 mm |