2009 Audi TT vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 735 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | TT | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2850 mm |
