2009 Audi TT vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 430 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
| Make | Audi | Talbot |
| Model | TT | Saoutchik |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 4480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3160 mm |
