2009 Audi TT vs. 1953 Buick 40
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 729 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Buick 40. (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1953 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | TT | 40 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 4315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3090 mm |