2009 Audi TT vs. 1953 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1953 Jaguar C-Type. (217 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1953 Jaguar C-Type.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jaguar C-Type. (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jaguar C-Type.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1953 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | C-Type |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3440 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2450 mm |