2009 Audi TT vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 221 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | CJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2040 mm |