2009 Audi TT vs. 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1956 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | TT | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3690 mm |
