2009 Audi TT vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Audi | Studebaker |
Model | TT | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2980 mm |