2009 Audi TT vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Humber Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
| Make | Audi | Humber |
| Model | TT | Hawk |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 110 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |
