2009 Audi TT vs. 1963 BMW 502
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 BMW 502. (158 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 502.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 502. (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 502.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1963 BMW 502 | |
| Make | Audi | BMW |
| Model | TT | 502 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3168 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 54 L |
