2009 Audi TT vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 315 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | TT | Elite |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |