2009 Audi TT vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 676 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | DeVille |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 79 L |