2009 Audi TT vs. 1964 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Wartburg 312. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1964 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Audi | Wartburg |
Model | TT | 312 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 6.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 43 L |