2009 Audi TT vs. 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 656 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
| Make | Audi | Austin-Healey |
| Model | TT | Sprite |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 714 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1350 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 27 L |
