2009 Audi TT vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | TT | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 6999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3030 mm |
