2009 Audi TT vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 255 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Caprice |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 6476 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3030 mm |