2009 Audi TT vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 276 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | TT | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 33 L |