2009 Audi TT vs. 1965 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1965 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2540 mm |