2009 Audi TT vs. 1966 Citroen Ami
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 691 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1966 Citroen Ami | |
Make | Audi | Citroen |
Model | TT | Ami |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 7.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 624 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 25 L |