2009 Audi TT vs. 1966 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (72 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford Zephyr. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1966 Ford Zephyr | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Zephyr |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |