2009 Audi TT vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (201 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 280 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1966 Renault 4 | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | TT | 4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |