2009 Audi TT vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 204 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
| Model | TT | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 27 L |
