2009 Audi TT vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Audi | Triumph |
| Model | TT | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |
