2009 Audi TT vs. 1968 BMW 1600
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1968 BMW 1600. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 BMW 1600 weights approximately 54 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 1600. (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1968 BMW 1600 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | 1600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |