2009 Audi TT vs. 1968 BMW 2800
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 BMW 2800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 BMW 2800 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 BMW 2800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1968 BMW 2800. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 BMW 2800.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 BMW 2800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 BMW 2800. (235 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 BMW 2800.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1968 BMW 2800 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | 2800 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |