2009 Audi TT vs. 1968 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1064 kg more than 2009 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1968 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 6954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
