2009 Audi TT vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 470 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 40 L |