2009 Audi TT vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 4 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |