2009 Audi TT vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 40 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | TT | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |
