2009 Audi TT vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Biscayne |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |