2009 Audi TT vs. 1973 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1973 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1973 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 425 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Nissan Cedric. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1973 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
