2009 Audi TT vs. 1975 Zastava 132
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 132. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Zastava 132 weights approximately 159 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1975 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | TT | 132 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 107 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2560 mm |
