2009 Audi TT vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1976 Datsun 280Z.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Datsun 280Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1976 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Audi | Datsun |
Model | TT | 280Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |