2009 Audi TT vs. 1976 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 15 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 1976 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1976 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |