2009 Audi TT vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 620 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | TT | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 1940 mm |