2009 Audi TT vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 241 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | TT | LJ 50 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 1940 mm |
