2009 Audi TT vs. 1978 Zastava 132

To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 240 kg more than 1978 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: